For CTOs: Architecture & Technical Lifecycle
Lifecycle planning starts with ownership boundaries between CRM admins, data owners, and engineering. Kickoff freezes the object model in scope and the events that matter. Discovery workshops score process complexity, data quality, and blast radius of bad writes. Only then do we pick rules versus models for each step. That sequence prevents prestige architecture that ignores the duplicate contact problem sitting in production today.
Design reviews force trade-offs into the open: sync versus async, share versus isolate tenants, native CRM automation versus external workers. External workers win when rate limits, multi-system joins, or heavier model use appear. Native tools win for simple field updates your admins already manage. Decisions are written so a new senior hire in six months can reconstruct why. Governance includes change control on prompts the same way you treat infrastructure.
Build phases keep a vertical slice live early. One flow runs in shadow, then limited write, then general availability. Feature flags switch audiences by team or region so a Tysons pilot does not flood Herndon HQ at once. Contract tests lock API shapes with CRM sandboxes. Load tests fake quarter-end spikes so queue depth and budget ceilings are known.
Production readiness checks cover rollback, kill switches, and on-call ownership. Runbooks state who pauses a worker and how to replay failed events without double charges. SLOs target end-to-end action latency and successful write percentage, not vanity model accuracy alone. Budget alerts sit beside latency alerts. Post-launch reviews happen at two and six weeks with ops present.
Longer lifecycle includes drift reviews. Field definitions change; ICPs shift; new products appear. Quarterly recalibration of routing rules and prompt packs stops slow decay. We document deprecation for flows that no longer earn their keep. That keeps the estate lean for Virginia companies that cannot fund permanent DIY research science teams.