An MVP around one workflow typically lands in eight to fourteen weeks when data access is prompt. That window covers discovery, contracts, build, pilot, and hard launch of assisted review. Full multi-site deployment with conditional auto-actions stretches into a second quarter. Parallel security reviews can either fit inside that path or add hold time if legal starts late.
Timeline hinges on three bottlenecks. First is clean sample data and field definitions. Second is API or export access from the systems of record. Third is named reviewers who can meet weekly. When those lag, the calendar slips even if engineers stay free. We publish a RACI on day three so delays have owners instead of blame fog.
MVP definition stays narrow. One entry channel, one exit system, human approval still required. Expansion features wait until metrics prove value. That discipline is why Roanoke teams see live use inside a quarter more often than broad platform bets. Full deployment adds more workflows, threshold tuning, and playbooks for neighboring sites like Vinton or Blacksburg.
Hypercare after launch usually runs two to four weeks. Engineers sit with ops on real tickets. Thresholds move with evidence. Documentation freezes only after the first steady week. If seasonal volume hits, we schedule extra eyes rather than rush automation. You always know which week delivers what artifact, including the monitoring handoff.