Timelines split into MVP learning loops and full production hardening. A focused MVP that proves one workflow can land in eight to twelve weeks when data access is ready on day one. That path includes discovery, thin vertical slice, eval harness, and a limited user group. Full deployment with multi-system writes, role design, monitoring, and staff training often runs four to seven months. Parallel workstreams shorten calendar time if your IT and security partners respond quickly. Alexandria contractor environments with detailed questionnaires can add weeks if access requests stall. Plan those reviews early.
MVP scope should lock a single success metric. Examples include average handle time on a call type, first-pass document accept rate, or hours to draft a proposal section. Resist stuffing five workflows into release one. Expanded scope without expanded data creates slips. After MVP, we harden for failure modes, load, and operator toolkits. That stage is where real-time translation pipelines, formal rules engines, and audit logging become production grade rather than demo grade.
Dependencies you control change the calendar more than coding speed. Legal review of data use, VPN provision, API credentials, and SME availability for labeling sit on the critical path. Voice projects need device and network tests on actual floors. Medical or HR use cases need policy sign-off before broad exposure. We publish a shared plan with owners so delays are visible. Waiting for silence is how projects miss 2026 budget windows.
After go-live, expect a stabilization period of four to eight weeks with tighter monitoring. Feature expansion resumes once override rates and costs sit inside agreed bands. Continuous delivery keeps improvements small. Large bang rewrites create risk. The honest answer on timing always starts from readiness, not a marketing slogan. Share your constraints and we will map a phased plan you can defend internally.